United States v. Fleming

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Fleming

551 F. App'x 85

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 24, 2014·No. No. 13-7668·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Latrenda Dinote Fleming appeals the district court’s order denying her self-styled Fed.R.Crim.P. 36 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Fleming, No. 1:10-cr-00449-AJT-1 (E.D.Va. filed Sept. 10, 2013; entered Sept. 11, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[86] fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Latrenda Dinote Fleming appeals the district court’s order denying her self-styled Fed.R.Crim.P. 36 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Fleming, No. 1:10-cr-00449-AJT-1 (E.D.Va. filed Sept. 10, 2013; entered Sept. 11, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[86] fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Fleming, 551 F. App'x 85 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

551 F. App'x 85 (United States v. Fleming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.