Home/Supreme Court/United States v. Fior D'Italia, Inc.

United States v. Fior D'Italia, Inc.

151 L. Ed. 2d 738, 122 S. Ct. 865, 534 U.S. 1102, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 407, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 330, 70 U.S.L.W. 3442, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 456
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 11, 2002
DocketNo. 01-463
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 151 L. Ed. 2d 738 (United States v. Fior D'Italia, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Fior D'Italia, Inc., 151 L. Ed. 2d 738, 122 S. Ct. 865, 534 U.S. 1102, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 407, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 330, 70 U.S.L.W. 3442, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 456 (U.S. 2002).

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted. Petitioner’s brief is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, February 25, 2002. Respondent’s brief is to be filed with [1103]*1103the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Wednesday, March 27, 2002. A reply brief, if any, is to be filed with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before 3 p.m., Monday, April 15, 2002. This Court’s Rule 29.2 is suspended in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Winkles v. State
894 So. 2d 842 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Warren Wesley Summerlin v. Terry L. Stewart, Director of Arizona Department of Corrections
341 F.3d 1082 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)
Zebroski v. State
822 A.2d 1038 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 2003)
Chandler v. State
848 So. 2d 1031 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)
Bottoson v. Moore
824 So. 2d 115 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
King v. Moore
824 So. 2d 127 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Sweet v. Moore
822 So. 2d 1269 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Rene Zambrano v. Jennifer Reinert, in Her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
291 F.3d 964 (Seventh Circuit, 2002)
State v. Finch
46 P.3d 421 (Arizona Supreme Court, 2002)
Cox v. State
819 So. 2d 705 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Saylor v. State
765 N.E.2d 535 (Indiana Supreme Court, 2002)
United States v. Juan Sanchez-Cervantes, AKA Hugo Quirox, Quiroc, Quiroz, Quiroz Trejo, and Quiroz Tapia
282 F.3d 664 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
Oken v. State
790 A.2d 612 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2002)
Bottoson v. State
27 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 119 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
King v. State
808 So. 2d 1237 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
151 L. Ed. 2d 738, 122 S. Ct. 865, 534 U.S. 1102, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 407, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 330, 70 U.S.L.W. 3442, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fior-ditalia-inc-scotus-2002.