United States v. Fernando Ceballos-Martinez
387 F.3d 1140, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 27587
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided June 16, 2004·No. 19-6143·Published·Cited by 93 cases
Opinions
ORDER
Upon further consideration of appellant’s petition for rehearing, the court called for an en banc poll.
The petition for rehearing was transmitted to the en banc court, which is composed of all of the judges of the court who are in regular active service, and is denied. Judges Henry, Briscoe, Lucero, and Hartz would grant rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Fernando Ceballos-Martinez, 387 F.3d 1140, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 27587 (10th Cir. 2004).
387 F.3d 1140 (United States v. Fernando Ceballos-Martinez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dewayne Clark v. CoreCivic, Inc., et al.
W.D. Oklahoma, 2025
Saulo Andres Martinez Diaz v. Russell Holt, et al.
W.D. Oklahoma, 2025
Antonio Vasquez Escarcega v. Sam Olson, et al.
W.D. Oklahoma, 2025
St. George v. City of Lakewood, Colorado
Tenth Circuit, 2024
Barrow v. Hudson
Tenth Circuit, 2024
Herrington v. Geary
Tenth Circuit, 2023
Yepa v. United States
D. New Mexico, 2022
United States v. Maxton
Tenth Circuit, 2022
Trujillo v. Kroebal
D. New Mexico, 2022
Andrews v. Spencer
D. Utah, 2021
Energy West Mining Company v. Director, OWCP
Tenth Circuit, 2019
Alemayehu v. Gemignani
Tenth Circuit, 2019
McCoy v. Allbaugh
689 F. App'x 582 (Tenth Circuit, 2017)
Pease v. Raemisch
673 F. App'x 877 (Tenth Circuit, 2016)
King v. Wyoming Attorney General
656 F. App'x 387 (Tenth Circuit, 2016)
Winkel v. Heimgartner
645 F. App'x 729 (Tenth Circuit, 2016)
Todd v. United States
620 F. App'x 675 (Tenth Circuit, 2015)
Allen v. Warden Falk
624 F. App'x 980 (Tenth Circuit, 2015)
United States v. Clifford Winkles
795 F.3d 1134 (Ninth Circuit, 2015)