United States v. Fareed

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 2, 2010·No. 10-7341·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7341

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KINGG BILALIAN FAREED,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:00-cr-00082-NCT-1)

Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: December 2, 2010

Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kingg Bilalian Fareed, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Kingg Bilalian Fareed appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for a reduction in sentence pursuant to

Amendment 706 to the Guidelines and 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Fareed, No. 1:00-cr-00082-NCT-1

(M.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Fareed, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Fareed (United States v. Fareed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related