United States v. Fareed
This text of United States v. Fareed (United States v. Fareed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7341
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KINGG BILALIAN FAREED,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:00-cr-00082-NCT-1)
Submitted: November 18, 2010 Decided: December 2, 2010
Before SHEDD and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kingg Bilalian Fareed, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Kingg Bilalian Fareed appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a reduction in sentence pursuant to
Amendment 706 to the Guidelines and 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Fareed, No. 1:00-cr-00082-NCT-1
(M.D.N.C. Sept. 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Fareed, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-fareed-ca4-2010.