United States v. Ellerbe

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2010·No. 09-7830·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7830

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES EDWARD ELLERBE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (5:97-cr-00100-BR-1)

Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 25, 2010

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Edward Ellerbe, Appellant Pro Se. John Samuel Bowler, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James Edward Ellerbe appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and its subsequent order denying

reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Ellerbe, No. 5:97-cr-

00100-BR-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 2, 2009; Dec. 9, 2009). We deny

Ellerbe’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ellerbe, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Ellerbe (United States v. Ellerbe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related