United States v. Ellerbe

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ellerbe

267 F. App'x 263

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2008·No. 07-7640·Unpublished

Opinion

*264 PER CURIAM:

James Edward Ellerbe appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for an arrest warrant and his motion to intervene. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Ellerbe, No. 5:97-cr-00100-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*264 PER CURIAM:

James Edward Ellerbe appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for an arrest warrant and his motion to intervene. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Ellerbe, No. 5:97-cr-00100-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Ellerbe, 267 F. App'x 263 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

267 F. App'x 263 (United States v. Ellerbe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.