United States v. Ellerbe

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ellerbe

267 F. App'x 263

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 27, 2008

Docket07-7640

StatusUnpublished

This text of 267 F. App'x 263 (United States v. Ellerbe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Ellerbe, 267 F. App'x 263 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

*264 PER CURIAM:

James Edward Ellerbe appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for an arrest warrant and his motion to intervene. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Ellerbe, No. 5:97-cr-00100-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*264 PER CURIAM:

James Edward Ellerbe appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for an arrest warrant and his motion to intervene. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Ellerbe, No. 5:97-cr-00100-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 31, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 F. App'x 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ellerbe-ca4-2008.