United States v. Ellerbe

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ellerbe

170 F. App'x 251

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 22, 2006·No. 05-7644·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James Edward Ellerbe appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel release of withheld discovery and his case file. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. See United States v. Ellerbe, No. CR-97-100-BR (E.D.N.C. filed Sept. 12, 2005 & entered Sept. 13, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

James Edward Ellerbe appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel release of withheld discovery and his case file. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. See United States v. Ellerbe, No. CR-97-100-BR (E.D.N.C. filed Sept. 12, 2005 & entered Sept. 13, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Ellerbe, 170 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

170 F. App'x 251 (United States v. Ellerbe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.