United States v. Ellerbe

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Ellerbe

55 F. App'x 692

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 12, 2003·No. Nos. 02-7604, 02-7889·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Edward Ellerbe appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a court order, denying his supplemental motion for a court order, denying his second supplemental motion for a court order, and denying his motion for a downward [693] departure. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the orders of the district court. See United States v. Ellerbe, No. CR-97-100 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 2002; filed Nov. 5, 2002 & entered Nov. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James Edward Ellerbe appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for a court order, denying his supplemental motion for a court order, denying his second supplemental motion for a court order, and denying his motion for a downward [693] departure. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the orders of the district court. See United States v. Ellerbe, No. CR-97-100 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 2002; filed Nov. 5, 2002 & entered Nov. 6, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Ellerbe, 55 F. App'x 692 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

55 F. App'x 692 (United States v. Ellerbe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.