United States v. Dutton

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 29, 2006·No. 05-7669·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7669

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LARRY DEAN DUTTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-103-MU)

Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 29, 2006

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Dean Dutton, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Larry Dean Dutton appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on a motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. See United States v. Dutton, No. CR-94-103-MU

(W.D.N.C. filed Sept. 29, 2005 & entered Sept. 30, 2005) ; see also

United States v. Moreno, 421 F.3d 1217, 1220 (11th Cir. 2005)

(holding United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), “is

inapplicable to § 3582(c) motions.”). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Dutton, (4th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Dutton (United States v. Dutton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Matthew Mark Moreno
421 F.3d 1217 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)