United States v. Dutton

173 F. App'x 229
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 29, 2006·No. No. 05-7669·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Larry Dean Dutton appeals the district court’s order denying relief on a motion to modify his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Dutton, No. CR-94-103-MU (W.D.N.C. filed Sept. 29, 2005 & entered Sept. 30, 2005); see also United States v. Moreno, 421 F.3d 1217, 1220 (11th Cir.2005) (holding United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), “is inapplicable to § 3582(c) motions.”). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Dutton, 173 F. App'x 229 (4th Cir. 2006).

173 F. App'x 229 (United States v. Dutton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Matthew Mark Moreno
421 F.3d 1217 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)