United States v. Derose
This text of 74 F.3d 1177 (United States v. Derose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
No. 94-8730.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Donald DEROSE, Roberta Ould, Defendants-Appellants.
March 15, 1996.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (No. 1:93-CR-236), Jack T. Camp, Judge.
Prior report: 74 F.3d 1177.
Before HATCHETT and CARNES, Circuit Judges, and OWENS*, Senior District Judge.
BY THE COURT:
Appellees' motion to modify published opinion is GRANTED. The
published opinion shall be modified as follows:
(1) By addition the word "initially" after the word "attorney"
and before the word "assigned" in the fourth sentence of the second
paragraph of the "Procedural History" section of the opinion. The
corrected sentence should read "The magistrate judge noted that the
one-year delay between the probable cause hearing and the dismissal
of the complaint was attributable to the "gross negligence' of the
assistant United States Attorney initially assigned to the case."
(2) By adding a footnote in the opinion following the
above-stated corrected sentence, which should read, "Neither of the
two attorneys listed in this opinion as counsel for the United
States of America on appeal was the Assistant United States
* Honorable Wilbur D. Owens, Jr., Senior U.S. District Judge for the Middle District of Georgia, sitting by designation. Attorney to whom the magistrate judge was referring."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 F.3d 1177, 1996 WL 34618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-derose-ca11-1996.