United States v. Denver Gene Richardson

484 F.2d 1046, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7862
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 18, 1973
Docket73-1245
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 484 F.2d 1046 (United States v. Denver Gene Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Denver Gene Richardson, 484 F.2d 1046, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7862 (9th Cir. 1973).

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

Richardson appeals from his conviction for failure to report for a physical examination in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. Trial was to the court, which found Richardson not guilty on a second count of failure to report for induction. We affirm.

Appellant challenges on hearsay grounds the admissibility of a stamped entry, “Failed to Report,” on the minute sheet of his Selective Service file. The entry was admissible under 28 U.S.C. § 1733(a). United States v. Hudson,. 479 F.2d 251 (9th Cir. 1972); United States v. Grans, 472 F.2d 597 (9th Cir. 1972).

Appellant contends that a prima facie showing that his I-A classification was without basis in fact is a defense to a prosecution for failing to report for a preinduction physical examination. The law is to the contrary. In United States v. Heinrich, 470 F.2d 238 (9th Cir. 1972), the court, sitting en banc, held that a prima facie showing by a registrant that he is entitled to a classification other than I-A does not relieve him of the duty to report for a physical examination ordered pursuant to the existing I-A classification.

Richardson also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his conviction. Appellant chose not to offer any evidence in his defense. Under these circumstances, with the Selective Service file entry in evidence, the proof was sufficient.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Henry Samuel Atkins, Jr.
528 F.2d 1352 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)
Ralph Kakumi Hara v. United States
505 F.2d 495 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
United States v. Denver Gene Richardson
484 F.2d 1046 (Ninth Circuit, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
484 F.2d 1046, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 7862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-denver-gene-richardson-ca9-1973.