United States v. Dario Restrepo

912 F.2d 1568, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 15972
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Dario Restrepo. Read the opinion of the Court — 946 F.2d 654
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 6, 1990·No. 88-3207·Published

Opinion

912 F.2d 1568

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Dario RESTREPO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 88-3207.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 6, 1990.

Prior report: 9th Cir., 903 F.2d 648.

Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, BROWNING, WALLACE, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Dario Restrepo, 912 F.2d 1568, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 15972 (9th Cir. 1990).

912 F.2d 1568 (United States v. Dario Restrepo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dario Restrepo
903 F.2d 648 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)
United States v. Restrepo
912 F.2d 1568 (Ninth Circuit, 1990)