United States v. Daniels

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6634

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TERRENCE ARNEZ DANIELS, a/k/a Tee, a/k/a Heck,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (5:01-cr-00736-CMC-2)

Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 2, 2009

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Terrence Arnez Daniels, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Terrence Arnez Daniels appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion to reduce

his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Daniels, No. 5:01-cr-

00736-CMC-2 (D.S.C. Apr. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED