United States v. Daniels

267 F. App'x 228
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 23, 2008
Docket07-4153
StatusUnpublished

This text of 267 F. App'x 228 (United States v. Daniels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Daniels, 267 F. App'x 228 (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Paul Daniels was stopped by military police on Fuller Road as he attempted to drive past Gate No. 1 into the Marine Corps Base at Quantico, Virginia. A magistrate judge found Daniels operated a vehicle on a suspended license, see 18 U.S.C. § 13 (2000), assimilating Va.Code Ann. § 46.2-301 (Michie 2004), and sentenced Daniels to six months’ supervised probation. Daniels appealed to the district court pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 58(g)(2), and the district court affirmed. Daniels appealed to this court, contending the district court erroneously found he was driving on a Virginia highway as defined by Va.Code Ann. § 46.2-100 (Michie Supp. 2007). Finding no error, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its thorough opinion. See United States v. Daniels, 471 F.Supp.2d 634 (E.D.Va.2007). We deny Daniels’ motion for leave to file an attachment to the Joint Appendix. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Daniels
471 F. Supp. 2d 634 (E.D. Virginia, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 F. App'x 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-daniels-ca4-2008.