United States v. Daniel Reyes-Zarate

619 F. App'x 671
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 19, 2015
Docket14-50450
StatusUnpublished

This text of 619 F. App'x 671 (United States v. Daniel Reyes-Zarate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Daniel Reyes-Zarate, 619 F. App'x 671 (9th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Daniel Reyes-Zarate appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 72-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a removed alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Reyes-Zarate contends that the district court erred in applying a 16-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii) because his prior conviction under California Penal Code § 211 is not a crime of violence. Reyes-Zarate’s argument is foreclosed. See United States v. Flores-Mejia, 687 F.3d 1213, 1216 (9th Cir.2012) (a conviction under California Penal Code § 211 is a categorical crime of violence); see also Miller v. Gammie, 335 F.3d 889, 893 (9th Cir.2003) (en banc) (three-judge panel is bound by circuit precedent unless that precedent is “clearly irreconcilable” with intervening higher authority).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Jose Flores-Mejia
687 F.3d 1213 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)
Miller v. Gammie
335 F.3d 889 (Ninth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
619 F. App'x 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-daniel-reyes-zarate-ca9-2015.