United States v. Cox

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 27, 2002·No. 01-7730·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7730

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KEVIN COX,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, Chief District Judge. (CR-99-52-S, CA-01-2640-S)

Submitted: March 14, 2002 Decided: March 27, 2002

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Cox, Appellant Pro Se. Tarra R. DeShields-Minnis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Kevin Cox seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying

his motions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) and 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (1994). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States

v. Cox, Nos. CR-99-52-S; CA-01-2640-S (D. Md. Sept. 6 & 18, 2001).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cox, (4th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Cox (United States v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related