United States v. Cox

59 F. App'x 587
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 13, 2003
DocketNo. 02-7458
StatusPublished

This text of 59 F. App'x 587 (United States v. Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Cox, 59 F. App'x 587 (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Adrian Cox seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cox has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1039-40, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). In addition, we decline to address issues raised for the first time on appeal. See Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir.1993). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller-El v. Cockrell
537 U.S. 322 (Supreme Court, 2003)
D.P. Muth J.P. Muth v. United States
1 F.3d 246 (Fourth Circuit, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 F. App'x 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cox-ca4-2003.