United States v. Council
This text of United States v. Council (United States v. Council) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7170
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
HERBERT COUNCIL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:92-cr-00097-GCM)
Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 24, 2008
Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Herbert Council, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Herbert Council appeals the district court’s order
denying his “Motion for the Court to Enter an Order for Immediate
Relief.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Council, No. 3:92-cr-00097-GCM (W.D.N.C.
July 24, 2007). We deny Council’s motion for bail pending appeal
and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Council, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-council-ca4-2008.