United States v. Council

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 24, 2008·No. 07-7170·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7170

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

HERBERT COUNCIL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:92-cr-00097-GCM)

Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 24, 2008

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herbert Council, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Herbert Council appeals the district court’s order

denying his “Motion for the Court to Enter an Order for Immediate

Relief.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Council, No. 3:92-cr-00097-GCM (W.D.N.C.

July 24, 2007). We deny Council’s motion for bail pending appeal

and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Council, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Council (United States v. Council) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.