United States v. Corey Ferguson

656 F. App'x 772
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJuly 29, 2016
Docket15-6240
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 656 F. App'x 772 (United States v. Corey Ferguson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Corey Ferguson, 656 F. App'x 772 (6th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

OPINION

BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, Circuit Judge.

Corey Ferguson appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Ferguson essentially argues that he is eligible for a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines. However, the district court sentenced Ferguson based on the career offender Guidelines, which are not subject to Amendment 782. Thus, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment.

I.

On August 15, 1991, Corey James Ferguson, then 20 years old, sold a one-eighth ounce bag of cocaine to a confidential informant. When police later arrested Ferguson, they found drug paraphernalia during a search of his apartment. As a result, on January 17, 1992, Ferguson pleaded guilty in state court to trafficking in a controlled substance. He received a five-year suspended sentence and was placed on supervised probation.

Three years later, Ferguson was pulled over for a routine traffic violation. Ferguson consented to a search of his car, and police found a large amount of cocaine *773 under the passenger seat. Based on that discovery, on August 31, 1995, Ferguson again pleaded guilty in state court to trafficking in a controlled substance. He received an eight-year sentence, but he was paroled after almost three years’ imprisonment.

In 2005, law enforcement officials began investigating drug-trafficking activities in Bowling Green, Kentucky. That investigation yielded evidence that Ferguson was a major supplier to the Bowling Green area. Police eventually arrested Ferguson and nine others in connection to the investigation. While his codefendants all accepted plea agreements, Ferguson instead opted to go to trial. On June 12, 2007, a jury found Ferguson guilty of (1) conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more of cocaine and (2) distributing cocaine.

Ferguson’s presentence investigation report (“PSR”) indicated a base offense level of 26 and a criminal history category of IV. However, because Ferguson’s two prior felony drug convictions qualified him for career offender status, the PSR raised his recommended offense level to 37 and his criminal history category to VI. Ferguson’s resulting sentencing Guidelines range was 360 months to life imprisonment.

The district court accepted the PSR’s recommendations. Ferguson argued for a downward variance to avoid any disparity in sentencing with his codefendants, which the district court granted. The district court found Ferguson to be a career offender, but it sentenced him below the applicable Guidelines range to 300 months of imprisonment.

In September 2015, Ferguson moved for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), arguing that his age, maturity, model record while in prison, deep remorse, as well as the declining health of his parents all warranted a sentence reduction. Ferguson later supplemented his motion, specifying that he sought a reduction in accordance with Amendment 782. On October 27, 2015, the district court denied Ferguson’s motion. The court explained that the career offender Guidelines it used to sentence Ferguson were not subject to Amendment 782. Ferguson appeals.

II.

A district court may adjust a term of imprisonment if that court based the original sentence on Guidelines 'that the Sentencing Commission has subsequently lowered. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We review de novo a district court’s determination that it lacks the authority to reduce a defendant’s sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). United States v. Riley, 726 F.3d 756, 758 (6th Cir. 2013) (labeling such a question as one of law).

A.

In 1984, as part of the Comprehensive Crime Control Act, Congress passed the Sentencing Reform Act. Pub. L. No. 98-473, ch. II (1984). The statute created the United States Sentencing Commission, an agency of the judicial branch responsible for setting criminal Sentencing Guidelines. See generally Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361, 363-70, 109 S.Ct. 647, 102 L.Ed.2d 714 (1989) (discussing the background, purpose, and operation of the Act and the Commission). Congress required “that the guidelines specify a sentence to a term of imprisonment at or near the maximum term authorized” for a defendant found guilty of a crime of violence or drug trafficking when he had two or more prior felony convictions for crimes of violence and/or drug trafficking. United States v. Tanner, 888 F.2d 1392 (6th Cir. 1989); see *774 28 U.S.C. § 991. The Commission complied with Congress’s mandate by promulgating the career offender guidelines under USSG § 4B1.1.

Two years later, Congress passed the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, which set penalties for crimes involving the sale or manufacture of crack cocaine one hundred times higher than for equivalent crimes involving powder cocaine. See Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85, 95-96, 128 S.Ct. 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007). In 2010, Congress reduced this discrepancy in the Fair Sentencing Act, which lowered the crack/powder cocaine sentencing ratio from 100:1 to 18:1. USSG § 2D1.1; United States v. Jackson, 678 F.3d 442, 443 (6th Cir. 2012).

In 2014, the Commission passed Amendment 782, which lowered the base offense level.for most drug trafficking crimes, and ■Amendment 788, which made Amendment 782 retroactive. United States v. Lucas, 636 Fed.Appx. 296, 297-98 (6th Cir. 2016). The Sentencing Commission estimated that, subject to a district court’s discretion, approximately 46,000 inmates could benefit from Amendment 782, with an average sentence reduction of approximately eighteen percent.. USSG Suppl. to App. C. amend. 788 at 87. However, Amendment 782 does not impact the career offender Guidelines found in USSG § 4B1.1. United States v. Snow, 634 Fed.Appx. 569, 573 (6th Cir. 2016).

Ferguson asserts that the district court sentenced him under the drug trafficking Guidelines in USSG § 2D1.1—not the career offender Guidelines in USSG § 4B1.1. He maintains that under Jackson, 678 F.3d at 444, we must look at the actual, range the district court applied and not necessarily what Guidelines the court claimed to apply.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Clarence Bonds
839 F.3d 524 (Sixth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
656 F. App'x 772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-corey-ferguson-ca6-2016.