United States v. Cooper
Opinion
Courtney Edward Cooper appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to modify sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Cooper, No. 1:03-cr-00528 (D.Md. Sept. 11, 2007). We dispense with oral argu *255 ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
266 F. App'x 254 (United States v. Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.