United States v. Cooper

127 F. App'x 109
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Cooper. Read the opinion of the Court — 87 F. App'x 912
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 26, 2005·No. 04-4773·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Courtney Edward Cooper pled guilty to one count of possession of stolen firearms in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(j) (2000). On August 31, 2004, the district court sentenced Cooper, over his objection based on Blakely v. Washington, — U.S.-, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004), to a term of imprisonment of 120 months followed by three years of supervised release. After Cooper filed his notice of appeal, the Supreme Court decided United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Cooper has filed an unopposed motion to vacate his sentence and remand for resentencing in light of Booker.

We grant the motion for remand to allow the district court to reconsider Cooper’s sentence in light of the Booker decision. Cooper indicates the only issue he wishes to pursue on appeal is the applicability of Blakely to the federal sentencing scheme as determined by the Supreme Court in Booker. Therefore, we affirm his conviction, vacate the sentence imposed by the district court, and remand for reconsideration of the sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cooper, 127 F. App'x 109 (4th Cir. 2005).

127 F. App'x 109 (United States v. Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blakely v. Washington
542 U.S. 296 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)