United States v. Coolidge

14 U.S. 415, 4 L. Ed. 124, 1 Wheat. 415, 1816 U.S. LEXIS 336
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 21, 1816·Published·Cited by 52 cases

Opinion

Johnson, J.

delivered the opinion, ol the court.

Upon the question now before the court a difference of opinion has existed, and still exists, among the members of the court. We should, therefore, have been willing to have heard the question discussed upon solemn argument. But the attorney-general has declined to argue,,the cause; and no counsel appears for the defendant. Under these circumstances the court would not choose to review their former decision in the case of the United States v. Hudson and Goodwin, or draw it into doubt. They *417 will, therefore, certify an opinion to the circuit court in conformity with that decision. J .

Certificate for the.defendant. a

a

Vide, 1 Gallison, 488, for the learned and elaborate opinion of Mr. J. Story, in the circuit court, in this case, tending to show that all offences within the admiralty jurisdiction are cognizable by the circuit court, and in the absence. of positive law, are punishable by 'fine and imprisonment. •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Coolidge, 14 U.S. 415, 4 L. Ed. 124, 1 Wheat. 415, 1816 U.S. LEXIS 336 (1816).

14 U.S. 415 (United States v. Coolidge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
N.D. California, 2026
(HC) Carman v. Ratliff
E.D. California, 2025
United States v. Lawrence P. Peters
435 F.3d 746 (Seventh Circuit, 2006)
United States v. Felix Severino
268 F.3d 850 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)
Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.
593 F. Supp. 1146 (D. New Jersey, 1984)
United States v. Walter T. Best
573 F.2d 1095 (Ninth Circuit, 1978)
James v. United States
366 U.S. 213 (Supreme Court, 1961)
State v. Myers
334 P.2d 536 (Washington Supreme Court, 1959)
Krulewitch v. United States
336 U.S. 440 (Supreme Court, 1949)
United States v. Bink
74 F. Supp. 603 (D. Oregon, 1947)
D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit Insurance
315 U.S. 447 (Supreme Court, 1942)
Ex Parte Grossman
267 U.S. 87 (Supreme Court, 1925)
People v. Torres
28 P.R. 783 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1920)
United States v. Mossew
261 F. 999 (N.D. New York, 1919)
Re Gompers
40 App. D.C. 293 (D.C. Circuit, 1913)
United States v. Grimaud
170 F. 205 (S.D. California, 1909)