United States v. Charles Lynch Paterson

780 F.2d 883, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21646
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 3, 1986
Docket85-1247
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 780 F.2d 883 (United States v. Charles Lynch Paterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Charles Lynch Paterson, 780 F.2d 883, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21646 (10th Cir. 1986).

Opinions

[884]*884PER CURIAM.

This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This matter is before the court on defendant-appellant’s application for bail pending appeal.

We have carefully examined the record and the papers submitted by the parties and conclude that the application for bail pending appeal should be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Flores
430 P.3d 534 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2018)
United States v. Woods
764 F.3d 1242 (Tenth Circuit, 2014)
United States v. Gonzales
995 F. Supp. 1299 (D. New Mexico, 1998)
United States v. Charles Lynch Paterson
780 F.2d 883 (Tenth Circuit, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
780 F.2d 883, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-charles-lynch-paterson-ca10-1986.