United States v. Charles Lynch Paterson
780 F.2d 883, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21646
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided January 3, 1986·No. 85-1247·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinions
This three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
This matter is before the court on defendant-appellant’s application for bail pending appeal.
We have carefully examined the record and the papers submitted by the parties and conclude that the application for bail pending appeal should be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Charles Lynch Paterson, 780 F.2d 883, 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 21646 (10th Cir. 1986).
780 F.2d 883 (United States v. Charles Lynch Paterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Flores
430 P.3d 534 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 2018)
United States v. Woods
764 F.3d 1242 (Tenth Circuit, 2014)
United States v. Blanco-Rodriguez
Tenth Circuit, 1999
United States v. Gonzales
995 F. Supp. 1299 (D. New Mexico, 1998)
United States v. Alphonso Pedraza, United States of America v. Peter Brent Irelan, United States of America v. Enrique Pedraza
27 F.3d 1515 (Tenth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Charles Lynch Paterson
780 F.2d 883 (Tenth Circuit, 1986)