United States v. Castro

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Castro. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 F.3d 557
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 17, 1996·No. 95-50793·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50793 Summary Calendar __________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GUADALUPE CASTRO,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-90-CR-142 - - - - - - - - - -

June 10, 1996

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Guadalupe Castro appeals from the district court's order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The district court abused its discretion in

failing to consider the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

as mandated by § 3582. Cf. United States v. Whitebird, 55 F.3d

1007, 1009-10 (5th Cir. 1995). We vacate the district court's

order denying the § 3582(c)(2) motion, and remand to the district

court for further proceedings.

Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-50793 -2-

VACATED AND REMANDED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Castro, (5th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Castro (United States v. Castro) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Malcolm Jones Whitebird
55 F.3d 1007 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)