United States v. Castro
This text of United States v. Castro (United States v. Castro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-50597 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
VICTOR CASTRO,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-95-CR-6-1 - - - - - - - - - - April 18, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DEMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Victor Castro appeals his 87-month sentence imposed as a
result of his conviction for being a felon in possession of a
firearm. Castro argues that the sentencing judge exhibited bias
against him and that this deprived him of the due process of law.
We have examined the record and Castro’s contentions and find no
reversible error.
AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Castro, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-castro-ca5-1996.