United States v. Carr

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 21, 2011
• Docket: 09-6808
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6808

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

HARLANDO OMAR CARR,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:96-cr-00020-H-1)

Submitted: March 8, 2011 Decided: March 21, 2011

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harlando Omar Carr, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Harlando Omar Carr appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

order. See United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 728-29 (4th

Cir. 2000); United States v. Carr, No. 5:96-cr-00020-H-1

(E.D.N.C. Apr. 21, 2009). We deny Carr’s motion for appointment

of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED