United States v. Carr
This text of 471 F. App'x 132 (United States v. Carr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Hadando Omar Carr appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 728-29 (4th Cir.2000); United [133]*133States v. Carr, No. 5:96-cr-00020-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2012). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
471 F. App'x 132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-carr-ca4-2012.