United States v. Campbell

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Campbell. Read the opinion of the Court — 237 F. App'x 787
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 5, 2009·No. 19-4534·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6453

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOSEPH J. CAMPBELL, a/k/a PI, a/k/a Pit,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (2:04-cr-01046-DCN-7)

Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 5, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph J. Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hayden Bickerton, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Joseph J. Campbell appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to dismiss indictment. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Campbell, No. 2:04-cr-01046-DCN-7 (D.S.C. Feb. 25, 2009). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Campbell, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Campbell (United States v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.