United States v. Campbell

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Campbell. Read the opinion of the Court — 237 F. App'x 787
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 5, 2008·No. 07-7338·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7338

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RICKY CAMPBELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. David A. Faber, District Judge. (5:05-cr-00013)

Submitted: February 28, 2008 Decided: March 5, 2008

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricky Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Charles T. Miller, United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Ricky Campbell appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion to reconsider filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). As

noted by the district court, civil procedural rules are

inapplicable for Campbell’s criminal proceeding. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Campbell’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. United States

v. Campbell, No. 5:05-cr-00013 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 31, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Campbell, (4th Cir. 2008).

United States v. Campbell (United States v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.