United States v. Campbell

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Campbell. Read the opinion of the Court — 237 F. App'x 787
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 10, 2009·No. 08-7403·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7403

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMEL CAMPBELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:02-cr-00123-RBS-2)

Submitted: January 14, 2009 Decided: February 10, 2009

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamel Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jamel Campbell appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reconsideration of the order finding him

ineligible for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

order. United States v. Campbell, No. 2:02-cr-00123-RBS-2 (E.D.

Va. June 16 & July 17, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Campbell, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Campbell (United States v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related