Home/Fourth Circuit/United States v. Butler

United States v. Butler

37 F. App'x 648
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Butler. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 F. App'x 130 →
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 18, 2002·No. No. 02-6157·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James A. Butler appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for clarification. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no [649]*649reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Butler’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Butler, No. CR-91-44 (E.D.Va. Jan. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Butler, 37 F. App'x 648 (4th Cir. 2002).

37 F. App'x 648 (United States v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.