United States v. Butler

5 F. App'x 156
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 1, 2001
Docket00-7672
StatusUnpublished

This text of 5 F. App'x 156 (United States v. Butler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Butler, 5 F. App'x 156 (4th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James A. Butler appeals the district court’s disposition of several motions he submitted pertaining to his pending 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) motion. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appeal-able interlocutory or collateral order. We deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 F. App'x 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-butler-ca4-2001.