United States v. Butler

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Butler. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 F. App'x 130
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 18, 2002·No. 02-6157·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6157

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES A. BUTLER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-44)

Submitted: June 13, 2002 Decided: June 18, 2002

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James A. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Gurney Wingate Grant, II, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

James A. Butler appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion for clarification. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny Butler’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on

the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Butler,

No. CR-91-44 (E.D. Va. Jan. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Butler, (4th Cir. 2002).

United States v. Butler (United States v. Butler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.