United States v. Burwell
This text of United States v. Burwell (United States v. Burwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6773
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
THOMAS EDWARD BURWELL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:04-cr-00111-REP-1)
Submitted: July 29, 2009 Decided: August 10, 2009
Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas Edward Burwell, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Thomas Edward Burwell appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for sentence reduction filed pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burwell,
No. 3:04-cr-00111-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 12, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Burwell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-burwell-ca4-2009.