United States v. Burwell

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 10, 2009
Docket09-6773
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Burwell (United States v. Burwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Burwell, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6773

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

THOMAS EDWARD BURWELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:04-cr-00111-REP-1)

Submitted: July 29, 2009 Decided: August 10, 2009

Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Edward Burwell, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Thomas Edward Burwell appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for sentence reduction filed pursuant

to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burwell,

No. 3:04-cr-00111-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 12, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Burwell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-burwell-ca4-2009.