United States v. Burwell

461 F. App'x 349
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 18, 2012
DocketNo. 11-6995
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 461 F. App'x 349 (United States v. Burwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Burwell, 461 F. App'x 349 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory W. Burwell appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to correct a clerical error in the judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 36. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Burwell, No. 3:03-cr-00203-REP-1 (E.D.Va. July 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Cotonuts
633 F. App'x 501 (Tenth Circuit, 2016)
United States v. Joshua Sampsell
541 F. App'x 258 (Fourth Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Rickett
535 F. App'x 668 (Tenth Circuit, 2013)
United States v. Ronald Atkins
498 F. App'x 276 (Fourth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Joe Clark, Jr.
483 F. App'x 802 (Fourth Circuit, 2012)
United States v. Frank Rogers
468 F. App'x 359 (Fourth Circuit, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
461 F. App'x 349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-burwell-ca4-2012.