United States v. Burton

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Burton

424 F. App'x 193

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Burton. Read the opinion of the Court — 359 F. App'x 430 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 2, 2011·No. No. 10-7241·Published

Opinion

[194]*194Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Trayone Burton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the order denying his request for transcripts at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burton, No. 3:07-cr-00773-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2010). We deny Burton’s motion for transcripts at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[194]*194Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Trayone Burton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the order denying his request for transcripts at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burton, No. 3:07-cr-00773-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2010). We deny Burton’s motion for transcripts at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Burton, 424 F. App'x 193 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

424 F. App'x 193 (United States v. Burton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.