United States v. Burton
This text of 424 F. App'x 193 (United States v. Burton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[194]*194Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Trayone Burton appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the order denying his request for transcripts at government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burton, No. 3:07-cr-00773-JFA-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 23, 2010). We deny Burton’s motion for transcripts at Government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
424 F. App'x 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-burton-ca4-2011.