United States v. Burton

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 8, 2009
Docket09-6192
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Burton (United States v. Burton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Burton, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6192

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DUANE MONTRIK BURTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:00-cr-00105-F-1)

Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 8, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Duane Montrik Burton, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Michael Gordon James, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Duane Montrik Burton appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burton,

No. 7:00-cr-00105-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 27, 2009). We further deny

Burton’s request for appointment of counsel. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Burton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-burton-ca4-2009.