United States v. Burton
This text of United States v. Burton (United States v. Burton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6192
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DUANE MONTRIK BURTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:00-cr-00105-F-1)
Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 8, 2009
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Duane Montrik Burton, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Michael Gordon James, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Duane Montrik Burton appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burton,
No. 7:00-cr-00105-F-1 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 27, 2009). We further deny
Burton’s request for appointment of counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Burton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-burton-ca4-2009.