United States v. Burton
182 F. App'x 216
Opinion
Duane Montrik Burton appeals the district court’s sealed January 31, 2006, order denying his sealed motion dated December 21, 2005. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Burton, No. 7:00-CR-105-1-F (E.D.N.C., Jan. 31, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Burton, 182 F. App'x 216 (4th Cir. 2006).
182 F. App'x 216 (United States v. Burton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.