United States v. Burgess

430 F. App'x 236

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kingdawud Mujahid Burgess appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Burgess, No. 1:06-cr-00429GBL-1 (E.D.Va. Dec. 22, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.