United States v. Burgess
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Keith Lavon Burgess appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Burgess, No. 4:03-cr-00107-TLW-1 (D.S.C. Aug. 11, 2009). See United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226 (4th Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 321, 175 L.Ed.2d 212 (2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
353 F. App'x 861 (United States v. Burgess) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.