United States v. Bryson

85 F. App'x 897
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Bryson. Read the opinion of the Court — 78 F. App'x 244
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 16, 2004·No. No. 03-7395·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William M. Bryson, Jr., seeks to appeal from the district court’s order denying his request that the court direct the Internal Revenue Service to present evidence to support the forfeiture of various parcels of real estate. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000). Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Bryson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Bryson, 85 F. App'x 897 (4th Cir. 2004).

85 F. App'x 897 (United States v. Bryson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)