United States v. Bryson
91 F. App'x 287
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Bryson. Read the opinion of the Court — 78 F. App'x 244 →
Opinion
William M. Bryson, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for return of property pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 41. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Floyd v. United States, 860 F.2d 999, 1003 (10th Cir.1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Bryson, 91 F. App'x 287 (4th Cir. 2004).
91 F. App'x 287 (United States v. Bryson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Jim Floyd v. United States
860 F.2d 999 (Tenth Circuit, 1988)