United States v. Bryson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6663

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIAM M. BRYSON, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-01-240-8-1; CR-01-712)

Submitted: July 23, 2004 Decided: August 19, 2004

Before LUTTIG, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William M. Bryson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Marvin Jennings Caughman, Mark C. Moore, Beth Drake, Assistant United States Attorneys, Columbia, South Carolina; Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

William M. Bryson, Jr., appeals from the district court’s

order denying his motion filed pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 33, in

which Bryson requested to be resentenced. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s order denying Bryson’s motion. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -