United States v. Brown
This text of 559 F. App'x 938 (United States v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert Nye, appointed counsel for Tish-ard Brown in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Brown, arguing that there are no non-frivolous grounds on which Brown could appeal either his conviction or his sentence. Nye filed a brief identifying arguable issues for appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Brown did not respond to Nye’s motion to withdraw or the Anders brief.
After a careful, independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no non-frivolous grounds on which Brown could base an appeal. For this reason, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brown’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
559 F. App'x 938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brown-ca11-2014.