United States v. Brown

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Brown

682 F. App'x 820

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 17, 2017·No. No. 16-14707 Non-Argument Calendar·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Charles Truncate, appoint counsel for Cedric Levar Brown, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issue of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brown’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Charles Truncate, appoint counsel for Cedric Levar Brown, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issue of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Brown’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Brown, 682 F. App'x 820 (11th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

682 F. App'x 820 (United States v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related