United States v. Brooks

332 F. App'x 67
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Brooks. Read the opinion of the Court — 524 F.3d 549
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 15, 2009·No. No. 09-6866·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Madison Brooks appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Brooks, No. 0:02-cr-01173-JFA-2 (D.S.C. Apr. 28, 2009). Brooks’ claim that the court could have resentenced him below the Sentencing Guidelines is foreclosed by this court’s opinion in United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.), cert denied, — U.S. —, 129 S.Ct. 2401, 173 L.Ed.2d 1296 (2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Brooks, 332 F. App'x 67 (4th Cir. 2009).

332 F. App'x 67 (United States v. Brooks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dunphy
551 F.3d 247 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)