United States v. Blair

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Blair. Read the opinion of the Court — 661 F.3d 755
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2009·No. 08-8074·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8074

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANGELA GWEN BLAIR,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (4:00-cr-00603-CWH-11)

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 25, 2009

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Angela Gwen Blair, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Angela Gwen Blair appeals the district court’s order

denying her motion filed under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) for

reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Blair, No.

4:00-cr-00603-CHW-11 (D.S.C. filed Sept. 15, 2008 & entered

Sept. 16, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Blair, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Blair (United States v. Blair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related